Actually, that’s precisely what I want you to do. Impossible thought it may seem.
In order to get to “like”, you first have to understand her. I’ve talked about this some in other places, but let’s look at it specifically in terms of people who do terrible things to others.
The director of Doubt (see When Your Character is Very, Very Bad) clearly thinks Sr. Aloysius does terrible things to others. Let’s look at why she does so.
As always, it comes down to her verb. At first blush, especially if you don’t like her, Sr. Aloysius’ verb seems to be “to get rid of Father Flynn” or “to expose him as a deviant”. Of these two choices, the former has more validity to me. While she certainly wants him to confess, repent, and reform, her bigger concern seems to get him out of the church (as a priest, anyway).
It’s not enough to say “to get rid of Father Flynn” – you have to follow it up with “why?” She could want to get rid of him because she thinks he is a discredit to the priesthood, because she can’t stand to look at him (his long fingernails turn her stomach), or because she thinks he is taking the parish in a dangerous direction. All three of those things do come into play in her feelings, I think, and are part of what helps to build a layered interpretation of Sr. Aloysius.
None of them get to the heart of the matter, however, which is this: She wants to protect Donald Muller and every other boy in her charge from Father Flynn’s predation.
“To protect her charges from rape” is a more positive spin on the situation than “to get rid of Father Flynn” isn’t it? It’s also more positive than “to get rid of an immoral priest” or “to stop a rapist”.
Why? Because protecting someone is a positive act; getting rid of, or stopping, someone has a negative tone to it.
If we go with “get rid of Father Flynn”, then if he is guilty of her charges, we’re okay with her actions, even if we don’t necessarily innocent of like her way of going about it. But if he is innocent of her charges, then her actions are vindictive. It’s an either/or proposition. We either approve of her (even if we don’t necessarily like her) or we hate her.
But if we go with “to protect her charges from rape”, we will find her at least somewhat likable (and not merely approve of her) whether Father Flynn is innocent or guilty, because she is motivated by something good – the desire to advocate for and protect all children in her care.
The fact that she is willing to “move away from God” (her words) in order to achieve her goal is, for a religious, a sacrifice of some consequence. This reveals how high the stakes are for her. She will do anything to protect innocent children from being defiled and abused.
Does this make her more likable and understandable to you? I hope so.
Next time, I’ll take you a little deeper into how this choice of verb affects your portrayal of Sr. Aloysius, and how the script supports this perspective.