There may be no successful playwright who has written more stage directions than N. Richard Nash, the author of the wonderful romantic comedy, The Rainmaker. (The 1956 movie starred Katharine Hepburn and Burt Lancaster.) The Rainmaker is chock full of emotional and physical choices, so much so that the usual measures of timing (minutes per page) can’t be used in determining the running time of the show!
Below is a portion of the scene between Lizzie, the old maid daughter of a rancher, and the Deputy Sheriff she has had her eye on for years. Read the scene through, including the stage directions, and visualize the scene in your mind’s eye. The directions are so extensive that I hope you can get a clear picture of how it can be played if you stick to everything in the script.
Now I’d like to show you how there are alternatives that ought to be at least considered, and by considered, I mean tried in an actual run-through of the scene. Because you won’t know if something works or not until you try it.
I’m starting the scene at Noah’s exit, in the middle of page 67 (here’s The Rainmaker Excerpt).
File (Going to the door) Well –
“Well” might mean, “Well, I guess I’ll be going”, but it doesn’t have to. Perhaps it means “Well, I’m not sure what else to say.” And even if it does indicate a departure, that’s a very good reason to not move to the door. When a character says he’s leaving and he doesn’t leave – or he moves his upper body as if to leave, but his feet stay planted – that’s a loud and clear message that his heart is still in the room. That’s both powerful and interesting to an audience.
Lizzie (Afraid he will leave) if File chooses to stay where he is when he says “Well”, perhaps Lizzie isn’t afraid that he will leave after all. And perhaps Nash is wrong when he says that Noah broke the spell between them. Perhaps he didn’t break the spell at all, and something monumental is happening between these two.
Lizzie (Snatching for a subject that will keep him here) If the spell still has them in its hold, then she doesn’t have to snatch. But more importantly – the topic of his divorce is huge. You don’t just snatch for such a sensitive topic because you want to keep someone in the room. You offer him a slice of pie to do that. No, the better (that is, the more dramatic choice) is for Lizzie to mention the divorce because she desperately wants to hear the details about it. For her, the divorce is what has kept them apart. Now is her chance to clear the air.
File: No – I wasn’t – (Then, studying her, he changes his mind.) – but I will.
The implication is that he is still at the door, ready to leave, until he studies her and changes her mind. Except that he doesn’t have to. He can still be standing stock still when he says “No, I wasn’t.” And he doesn’t necessarily change his mind, he simply decides to tell her. And that’s a very different thing for an actor.
Lizzie (Helping him to get it said) Kentucky?
Maybe Lizzie IS trying to help him. Maybe she is just trying to connect with him, to indicate her understanding. Or maybe she is covering her own nervousness about the topic but saying something, anything. Or maybe she is puzzled by someone from so far away stealing File’s wife – how did he come to be so far west?
File (A step toward her) Yes, she was.
Lizzie (Her hopes dashed)
If File is moving toward her, why are her hopes dashed? When the man you love moves toward you, it’s a positive sign. It offsets the “Yes, she was”, or at least should cause confusion. The moment is probably stronger if he stands still and watches her while she becomes a nervous wreck.
As for Lizzie’s next lines, I almost think the start of the word “afraid” is too much. It’s implicit in the line and is overkill if she actually says it. If I had written the play, I would have had her stop at “That’s what I w—“, or maybe even drop the “w”. And rather than “catches herself”, I might have said “smiles”, as in that bright smile that covers the tears. But even if we leave the line as written, the smile still works.
Lizzie (Drearily). Why drearily? And on her next line, why “Agreeing – but without heart?” What if Lizzie sincerely believes that women with black hair are the most beautiful, and her mousey brown is unattractive?
File sits when he describes the schoolteacher. But is there any compelling reason to? I’d have the actor try it standing, try it pacing, try it with movement that isn’t pacing, AND try it sitting. I can’t begin to guess which choice better underlines what is going on for File emotionally until I see what impact the movement has on how he behaves and says his lines.
File (Raging) What if the rage comes between “No I didn’t” and “Why should I?”, instead of before both sentences?
Lizzie (Astounded) The only problem with this adjective is that the word tends to indicate something big, and the italics in her lines that follow underscore that intention. But what if she is a combination of exasperated and astonished on “Why should you?” and then goes very quiet and intense on “Why didn’t you?” Or the opposite: a very quiet “Why should you?” as if she can’t believe he even asks that, it’s so absurd, followed by a loud, berating “Why didn’t you?”
Lizzie (Desperately) What if she isn’t desperate on this, but instead challenges him with this line?
I could go on, but I hope I’ve made my point. Nash’s choices certainly work, but so do mine. Only by trying them can you determine which works better. Or perhaps find a way of combining the two!