“Cheating”, in case you don’t know, is what we call “opening” yourself up, physically, to the audience, even if in real life you’d be facing in a different direction. For instance, let’s say that two actors are face-to-face downstage center, which means that the fronts of their bodies are perpendicular to the proscenium. This gives the audience in the center of the theater their profiles. Anyone sitting on the sides gets a reasonable look at the face of one of the actors, and the back of the head of the other.
For brief moments, this is all right. If it lasts for more than a few lines, however, it becomes problematic. The profile view deprives the center of the audience of some emotional impact, which requires a more direct look at the actors’ faces. The views from the sides of the audience are one-sided – that is, they have a good idea of what one actor is feeling, but can read nothing of the other actor’s feelings except from general body language, since they can’t see his face at all.
Once upon a time (like back in the days of the Greeks and for many centuries afterward), acting was declamatory. Actors faced the audience fully and spoke. There was no real pretense at reality as we know it today.
Somewhere along the line – perhaps because of Stanislavsky, or perhaps it began before him – actors began to pull one foot back a little so the front of their bodies were no longer parallel to the proscenium, but they were angled slightly – a bit of acknowledgment that they were talking to someone else on the stage, not to the audience. These days, 45 degrees is typically the right place to start, and you adjust from there – more “open” (facing the audience more) when you can get away with it, and less “open” (facing another actor more than you do the audience) when the interaction between characters demands it (arguments, etc.)
If you aren’t used to cheating, it feels very unnatural, for the simple reason that it is. We are accustomed to facing people more directly when we interact with them, and “opening” ourselves up, physically, to the audience for reasons of sightlines is nothing like what we do in real life. However, it’s a necessary adjustment that adds to the audience’s pleasure and understanding.
The first thing you need to know about cheating is that it looks better from the audience than you think it does. A few years back, I did a production of Blithe Spirit with an actor who did a lot of musical comedy. In musical comedy, the cheating is a lot more apparent, because songs are typically directed out to the audience, even if they are being sung to someone else on stage.
When I watched Nick work in scenes I wasn’t in, I studied how he stood and how I felt about it, as an audience member. He was angled at perhaps 20 degrees, not 45, and from the audience’s perspective, that’s almost as if he is facing them, and yet I never felt like he wasn’t fully involved with his partner. In other words, it looked perfectly natural and realistic to me. Why?
There’s two ways to handle this, and only one way works. The way that doesn’t is to stand as Nick did and turn your head to your partner for the bulk of the scene (both when you’re listening and when you’re talking). This isn’t much better than if you stood at profile to the audience, or anything between 45 and 90 (or more) degrees. If the point of cheating is to give the audience a better look at your face, then turning your head defeats the purpose.
What does work? That’s for the next post!